19 May 1986 [1986] ICR 862, EAT
05 Mar 1987 [1988] QB 12; [1987] 3 WLR 20; [1987] ICR 682; [1987] 2 All ER 344, CA
05 May 1988 (pet all) [1988] AC 894; [1987] 3 WLR 30F; [1988] 2 WLR 1134; [1988] ICR 464; [1988] 2 All ER 257, HL(E)
DISCRIMINATION, SEX — Equal pay — Work of equal value — Work of applicant and male comparators of equal value — Applicant's basic pay less than comparators — Other conditions more favourable to applicant — Whether entitlement to complain of inequality in relation to specific term irrespective of benefits under contract as a whole — Equal Pay Act 1970, s 1(2)(c) (as amended by Sex Discrimination Act 1975, s 8 and Equal Pay (Amendment) Regulations 1983, reg 2(1))
[1988] AC 894; [1988] QB 12; [1987] 3 WLR 20; [1988] 2 WLR 1134; [1986] ICR 862; [1987] ICR 682; [1988] ICR 464
Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd (No 2) [1986] ICR 862, EAT
Decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal affirmed
Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd (No 2) [1988] QB 12; [1987] 3 WLR 20; [1987] ICR 682; [1987] 2 All ER 344, CA
Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd (No 2) [1988] QB 12; [1987] 3 WLR 20; [1987] ICR 682; [1987] 2 All ER 344, CA
Decision of the Court of Appeal reversed
Hayward v Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd (No 2) [1988] AC 894; [1987] 3 WLR 30F; [1988] 2 WLR 1134; [1988] ICR 464; [1988] 2 All ER 257, HL(E)
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies