R v Quick

Additional names

R v Paddison

Subject Matter

CRIME — Insanity — Automatism — Assault — Defence that accused suffering from hypoglycaemia — Medical evidence — Ruling by judge that evidence relevant only to plea of insanity — Whether hypoglycaemia disease of the mind — Whether duty of judge to leave defence of automatism to jury

[1973] QB 910; [1973] 3 WLR 26

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Voluntary and Involuntary Conduct - Introduction A1.10

Defences Denying Basic Elements of Liability - Insanity: General Principles: the M‘Naghten Rules - ‘… from disease of the mind’ A3.30

Defences Denying Basic Elements of Liability - Insanity: General Principles: the M‘Naghten Rules - ‘… from disease of the mind’ A3.31

Defences Denying Basic Elements of Liability - Automatism A3.13

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies