Vidyasagara v The Queen

Subject Matter

BARRISTER — Contempt of court — Statement disparaging court — Made on instructions — Whether a defence — Ceylon

[1963] AC 589; [1963] 2 WLR 1033

CONTEMPT OF COURT — Ceylon — Contempt of court — Industrial Court — Statement read by counsel on instructions of client — Allegation of improbability of impartial inquiry — Calculated to bring court into disrepute — Counsel responsible for statement — Not entitled to privilege — Industrial Disputes Act, No 43 of 1950 (as amended by No 62 of 1957, s 40a)

[1963] AC 589; [1963] 2 WLR 1033

CONTEMPT OF COURT — Counsel — Statement to court disparaging court — Allegation of improbability of impartial inquiry — Statement made on instructions — Industrial Court (Ceylon)

[1963] AC 589; [1963] 2 WLR 1033

Appellate History

Vidyasagara v The Queen (1960) 62 NLR 388

Judgment and decree of the Supreme Court of Ceylon affirmed

Vidyasagara v The Queen [1963] AC 589; [1963] 2 WLR 1033, PC

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies