Uddin v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd

Subject Matter

FACTORY — Dangerous machinery (fencing) — Revolving shaft in upper storey of factory — Whether “transmission machinery” — Machine intended to be driven by mechanical power — Unfenced shaft — Whether breach of duty by employers of workmen to fence — Factories Act, 1937, ss 17, 152

[1965] 2 QB 15; [1965] 2 WLR 327

FACTORY — Dangerous machinery (manufacture) — Persons liable — Machine intended to be driven by mechanical power — Manufacturer's obligation — Whether any duty upon factory employer or occupier — Factories Act, 1937, s 17

[1965] 2 QB 15; [1965] 2 WLR 327

FACTORY — “Persons employed” — Unauthorised act — Unauthorised act in unauthorised place by workman — Workman injured by unfenced revolving shaft — Injury sustained during working hours — Whether duty to fence — Whether employers in breach of duty — “Employed” — Factories Act, 1937, s 14 (1)

[1965] 2 QB 15; [1965] 2 QB 582; [1965] 2 WLR 1183; [1965] 2 WLR 327

STATUTE — Construction — Side note — Cannot be used as aid to construction — Factories Act, 1937, s 17

[1965] 2 QB 15; [1965] 2 WLR 327

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies