R v Warner (Reginald)

Additional names

Warner v Metropolitan Police Comr

Subject Matter

CRIME — Drugs — Unauthorised possession of — Meaning — Defendant in possession of box which he knew to contain something — Whether defence that he did not know it contained drugs — Drugs (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1964, s 1 (1)

[1969] 2 AC 256; [1967] 1 WLR 1209; [1968] 2 WLR 1303

Appellate History

R v Warner (Reginald) [1967] 1 WLR 1209; [1967] 3 All ER 93, CA

Decision of the Court of Appeal reversed on the point of law

R v Warner (Reginald) [1969] 2 AC 256; [1968] 2 WLR 1303; [1968] 2 All ER 356; 52 Cr App R 373, HL(E)

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Relationship between Actus Reus and Mens Rea - A Mental Element in the Actus Reus? A1.5

Belief A2.15

Strict Liability - Imposition of Strict Liability - Social Dangers A2.26

Possessing etc. Firearm or Ammunition without Firearm Certificate - Possession Generally B12.44

Possessing etc. Firearm or Ammunition without Firearm Certificate - Possession and Mens Rea B12.45

Possessing or Distributing Prohibited Weapons or Ammunition - Strict Liability for s. 5 Offence B12.78

Possession of Offensive Weapon - ‘Has with Him’ and Knowledge - Lack of Knowledge that the Thing was a Weapon B12.169

Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Meaning of ‘Possession’ - Knowledge of Possession B19.31

Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Drugs in Containers B19.36

Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Mens Rea B19.38

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies