Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association

Hearings

England & Wales

[1964] 2 Lloyd's Rep 227, QBD (Havers J)

20 Dec 1965 [1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

08 May 1968 [1969] 2 AC 31; [1968] 3 WLR 110; [1968] 2 All ER 444; [1968] 1 Lloyd's Rep 547, HL(E)

Additional names

Grimsdale & Sons Ltd v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association
Holland Colombo Trading Society Ltd v Grimsdale & Sons Ltd
Kendall (Henry) & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd

Subject Matter

ANIMAL — Bird — “Poultry” — Whether including partridges and pheasants

[1969] 2 AC 31; [1968] 3 WLR 110; [1968] 2 All ER 444; [1968] 1 Lloyd's Rep 547, HL(E)

SALE OF GOODS — Cif — Implied statutory warranty — Toxic gound-nut extractions sold for resale and manufacture into compound food for poultry — Circumstances in which implied statutory warranty as to suitability applies to cif contracts — Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Act, 1926, s 2 (2)

[1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

SALE OF GOODS — Implied term — Fitness for purpose and merchantable quality — Toxic ground-nut extraction sold for compounding into poultry food — Oral contract confirmed by sale note placing responsibility for latent defects on buyer — Effect of — Extraction suitable for some purposes but not for the particular purpose for which sold — Whether a breach of implied terms as to fitness and merchantability — Buyers and sellers of goods members of same trade association — Contracts on Association's standard form — Clause placing responsibility for latent defects on buyers — Whether buyers entitled to rely on sellers' skill and judgment — Sale of Goods Act, 1893, s 14 (1) (2)

[1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

SALE OF GOODS — Warranty — Implied statutory warranty — Ground-nut extraction sold to manufacturer for use as ingredient in compound food for poultry — Food fed to pheasants and partridges — Deaths of chicks and poults due to toxic substance in ground-nut extraction — Whether warranty as to suitability of “article” for use as food for poultry applicable — Whether damages recoverable — “Poultry” — Meaning of — “Article” — Meaning of — Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Act, 1926, s 2 (2), Sch 1

[1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

Appellate History

Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association [1964] 2 Lloyd's Rep 227, QBD

Decision of Havers J affirmed in part

Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association [1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association [1966] 1 WLR 287; [1966] 1 All ER 309; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 197, CA

Decision of the Court of Appeal affirmed

Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association [1969] 2 AC 31; [1968] 3 WLR 110; [1968] 2 All ER 444; [1968] 1 Lloyd's Rep 547, HL(E)

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies