R v Windle

Subject Matter

CRIME — Criminal law — Defence of insanity — McNaghten rules — Knowledge of accused that act committed was “wrong” — Meaning of “wrong” — McNaghten rules not confined to cases of delusion — No evidence of insanity — Right of judge to withdraw issue from jury.

[1952] 2 QB 826, CCA

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Defences Denying Basic Elements of Liability - Insanity: General Principles: the M‘Naghten Rules - ‘… or … that he did not know he was doing what was wrong’ A3.33

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies