Badea v Romanian Judicial Authority - Viewing document

Catchwords

Jump to page (829 to 856)

Jump to paragraph (1 to 44)

Referenced Legislation

Human Rights Act 1998 (c 42), Sch 1, Pt I, art 8

Extradition Act 2003 (c 41), ss 21, 21A

Trade and Co-operation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, art 597

Prepared for Unknown User. © ICLR 2026

The Law Reports (Queen's Bench Division)

[2022] QB 828

Queen’s Bench Division

Badea v Romanian Judicial Authority

[2022] EWHC 1025 (Admin)

2022 March 22; May 4

Fordham J

Extradition— European arrest warrant— Proportionality— Requested person arrested on conviction warrant after United Kingdom’s departure from European Union— Whether district judge required to adopt modified approach to proportionality in order to comply with United Kingdom’s obligations to European Union— Human Rights Act 1998 (c 42), Sch 1, Pt I, art 8 — Extradition Act 2003 (c 41), ss 21, 21A — Trade and Co-operation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, art 597

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.