Smith v Trafford Housing Trust
[2012] EWHC 3320 (Ch)
Ch D
23 November 2012
Briggs J
Appearances

Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth ) for the claimant; Andrew Short QC (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors ) for the defendant.

COSTSOrder forOffer of settlementWhether unjust for claimant to pay whole of opposing party’s costsCPR r 36.14(4)

This is a judgment on costs. The claimant accepted that the defendant trust’s offer was made in accordance with CPR Pt 36 but submitted that it would be unjust for the claimant to pay the whole of the trust’s costs from 11 January 2012 on the ground, inter alia, that the claim was not a money claim, but rather a successful vindication by the claimant of his right to free speech after an unjustified finding of gross misconduct.

Decision

In all the circumstances it would be unjust for the claimant to have to pay the trust’s costs of the proceedings from 11 January 2012. Justice would be served by making no order for costs.

Relevant cases considered
Matthews v Metal Improvements Co Inc [2007] EWCA Civ 215; [2007] CP Rep 329, CA
Factortame Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (Cost) (No 1) [2002] EWCA Civ 22; [2002] WLR 2438, CA
Lilleyman v Lilleyman[2012] 1056 (Ch); [2012] 1 WLR 2801

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies