Supreme Court
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others
[2013] UKSC 34
[On appeal from Prest v Prest]
2013 March 5, 6;
June 12
Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption JJSC, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
Husband and wifeFinancial reliefTransfer of propertyProperties held by companies controlled by husbandWife alleging that properties belonging beneficially to husbandHusband and companies failing to comply with orders for disclosureHusband ordered to transfer properties to wife or to cause them to be so transferredWhether property to which husband “entitled”Whether conditions for piercing companies’ corporate veils establishedWhether court entitled to draw adverse inferences as to beneficial ownership of propertiesWhether jurisdiction to order husband to transfer properties held by companies to wife Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c 18), s 24(1)(a)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies