Supreme Court
*Dunhill v Burgin (Nos 1 and 2)
[2014] UKSC 18
2014 Feb 3, 4, 5; March 12
Baroness Hale of Richmond DPSC, Lord Dyson MR, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed JJSC
PracticePartiesMental capacityLegally represented claimant compromising claim for personal injuriesConsent order giving effect to compromiseWhether claimant having lacked capacity at time of compromiseRule of court making compromise of claim by or on behalf of person lacking capacity invalid unless approved by courtWhether rule applying only where claimant having litigation friendWhether ultra viresWhether consent order constituting court’s approval of compromiseWhether compromise invalidWhether consent order to be set aside CPR rr 21.2(1), 21.10(1)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies