TRADE MARKInfringementBurden of proofDefendant paying search engine to advertise its flower delivery service through keyword advertisingAdvertising appearing in response to entry into search engine of search terms consisting of or comprising word protected by claimants’ trade marksClaimants alleging infringement of trade marksWhether reasonably well-informed Internet users able to ascertain whether goods or services advertised originating from trade mark proprietorWhether burden of proof lying on defendant to prove non-infringementWhether defendant using trade mark by using flower-related generic termsTrade Marks Act 1994, s 10(1)(2)Council Directive 89/104/EEC, art 5(1)(a)Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, art 9(1)(a)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies