House of Lords
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening)
[2008] UKHL 63
2008 June 18;
Oct 22
Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lord Mance and Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury
Human rightsRight to peaceful enjoyment of possessionsDisability premiumRegulations providing for disability premium not to be payable to disabled person without accommodationCessation of payments to claimant on becoming homelessWhether right to receive premium “possession”Whether Convention right to peaceful enjoyment of “possessions” engagedWhether Regulations giving rise to discrimination in enjoyment of Convention right on ground relating to “other status”Whether justifiedWhether Regulations incompatible with Convention rights Human Rights Act 1998 (c 42), Sch 1, Pt I, art 14, Pt II, art 1 Income Support (General) Regulations 1987 (SI 1987/1967), Sch 7, para 6
Judicial precedentCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)Relevance of European decisionsCourt of Appeal considering its earlier decision to be inconsistent with subsequent decision of European Court of Human RightsWhether obliged to follow earlier decisionWhether obliged to follow earlier decision of House of Lords appearing to be inconsistent with subsequent decision of European Court of Human RightsApplication of principles in relation to decisions of European Patents Office Board of Appeal

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies