Supreme Court
Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening)
[2009] UKSC 3
2009 July 13, 14;
Oct 29
Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC, Lord Saville of Newdigate JSC, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood JSC, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR
Confidential informationDisclosurePoliceEnhanced criminal record certificateDuty of chief officer of police to disclose information he considered ought to be included in certificate because relevant for purpose of exempted question asked in course of considering applicant’s suitability for position involving caring for, training, supervising or being in sole charge of childrenWhether information not relating to criminal or potentially criminal activity “relevant” Police Act 1997 (c 50), s 115(7)
Human rightsRight to respect for private and family lifeDisclosure of informationInformation collected and stored in police recordsStatutory duty of chief officer of police to provide relevant information which he considered ought to be included in enhanced criminal record certificate in respect of applicant for employment involving contact with children or vulnerable adultsWhether applicant’s right to respect for private life engagedWhether need to protect children and vulnerable adults overriding applicant’s right to respect for private life Police Act 1997 (c 50), s 115(7) Human Rights Act 1998 (c 42), Sch 1, Pt I, art 8(1)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies