House of Lords
Norris v Government of the United States of America
[2008] UKHL 16
2008 Jan 24, 28, 29,
March 12
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Carswell, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood and Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury
ExtraditionExtradition offenceJurisdictionDefendant charged in United States of America with conspiracy to fix prices and obstructing United States investigatorsPrice fixing charge not requiring dishonestyWhether conduct constituting common law conspiracy to defraudWhether secrecy of agreement supplying ingredient of dishonesty necessary for common law offenceWhether common law offence sufficiently clear and ascertainableWhether requirement that ingredients of United States offence and English offence correspondWhether obstruction allegation requiring transposition of locality and institutionsWhether extradition offencesWhether further information to be requested from United States authorities as to evidence in order to determine whether extradition barred by reason of passage of timeWhether issue of compatibility of extradition with Convention rights to be remitted for determination by district judge Extradition Act 2003 (c 41), ss 82, 87(1), 137(2)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies