Supreme Court
In re I (A Child) (Contact Application: Jurisdiction) (Centre for Family Law and Practice and another intervening)
[2009] UKSC 10
2009 Oct 12, 13;
Dec 1
Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony JJSC
Conflict of lawsJurisdiction under Council RegulationOrders with respect to childrenMother seeking contact order in respect of child habitually resident in PakistanCouncil Regulation allowing “opt in” to jurisdiction of courts of member state not otherwise having jurisdictionRequirement that jurisdiction accepted by “all parties to the proceedings at the time the court is seised”Whether Regulation applicable to child habitually resident outside European UnionWhether court having jurisdiction to make contact orderWhether acceptance of jurisdiction necessary before seisin Family Law Act 1986 (c 55) (as amended by Children Act 1989 (c 41), s 108(5), Sch 13, paras 62(2)(a), 63(1)(a), European Communities (Jurisdiction and Judgments in Matrimonial and Parental Responsibility Matters) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/265), reg 8(1)(2) and Civil Partnership (Family Proceedings and Housing Consequential Amendments) Order 2005 (SI 2005/3336), art 5), ss 1(1)(a), 2(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, art 12(3)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies