Supreme Court
*Bridge Trustees Ltd v Houldsworth and another (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening)
[On appeal from Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening)]
[2011] UKSC 42
2011 June 20, 21; July 27
Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony JJSC, Lord Collins of Mapesbury
TrustsPension schemeUnderprovisionSalary related scheme restructured to provide benefits related to members’ contributions and matching credits from employerWhether money purchase benefitsWhether features of scheme precluding benefits from being money purchase benefits Pension Schemes Act 1993 (c 48), s 181(1) Pensions Act 1995 (c 26), s 73 Occupational Pension Schemes (Winding Up) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/3126), reg 13

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies