[HOUSE OF LORDS]
BROWN APPELLANT AND STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL RESPONDENT
[On appeal from STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL v. BROWN]
1988 Feb. 17, 18;
April 21
Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Lowry, Lord Brandon of Oakbrook, Lord Griffiths and Lord Goff of Chieveley
EmploymentUnfair dismissalRedundancySelection for redundancyPregnancy of employeeEmployee not offered reengagementWhether reason for dismissal pregnancy Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 (c. 44), ss. 57(2)(c)(3), 60(1)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies