The Law Reports (Appeal Cases)
[1987] AC 66
[HOUSE OF LORDS]
ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL. APPELLANT AND ROGERS AND ANOTHER. RESPONDENTS
[On appeal from ROGERS V. ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL]
1986 July 28;
Oct. 16
Oct. 16
Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Brandon of Oakbrook, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord Ackner and Lord Oliver of Aylmerton
Education
— School
— Attendance
— “Walking distance”
— Designated route along isolated unlit track
— Whether “nearest available route”
—
Education Act 1944 (7 & 8 Geo. 6, c. 31), s. 39 (2) (c) (5)[1]