[HOUSE OF LORDS]
GARDNER RESPONDENT AND MOORE AND ANOTHER APPELLANTS
1984 Feb. 28;
April 5
Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone L.C., Lord Diplock, Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Brandon of Oakbrook and Lord Templeman
Road TrafficThird party insuranceMotor Insurers' BureauThird party injured by criminal act of driver of vehicle on a roadWhether injury “caused by, or arising out of, the use of the vehicle on a road”Whether “relevant liability” under M.I.B. agreementWhether bureau liable to indemnify third party injured by criminal use of vehicle on road Road Traffic Act 1972 (c. 20), ss. 143(1), 145(1)(3)
InsurancePublic policyThird party insuranceCriminal use of vehicle on a roadUnsatisfied judgment obtained against uninsured guilty driverWhether Motor Insurers' Bureau liable to indemnify injured third party under agreement with Secretary of State

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies