[PRIVY COUNCIL]
ONG AH CHUAN APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR RESPONDENT
KOH CHAI CHENG APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR RESPONDENT
[APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL OF SINGAPORE]
1980 July 21, 22, 23, 24;
Oct. 15
Lord Diplock, Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Scarman and Lord Roskill
SingaporeCrimeDrugsTraffickingMore than two grammes of heroin conveyed by carWhether “transport”Statutory presumption of “trafficking” when in possession of more than two grammes of heroinWhether rebutted Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 (No. 5 of 1973), ss. 2 (a), 3, 10, 15 (as amended by Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 1975 (No. 49 of 1975), ss. 3, 5)
SingaporeConstitutionStatutory rebuttable presumptionPossession of more than two grammes of heroin presumed traffickingWhether unconstitutionalWhether death sentence for trafficking in more than 15 grammes of heroin unconstitutional Constitution of Republic of Singapore (reprint March 31, 1980), arts. 9 (1), 12 (1) Misuse of Drugs Act 1973, ss. 15, 29 (as amended by Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 1975, ss. 5, 9, 13)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies