[HOUSE OF LORDS]
MEGARITY AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS AND THE LAW SOCIETY APPELLANTS
[On appeal from MEGARITY v. D. J. RYAN & SONS LTD. (NO.2)]
GAYWAY LININGS LTD. RESPONDENT AND THE LAW SOCIETY APPELLANTS
1981 Jan. 21, 22, 26;
Feb. 19
Lord Diplock, Lord Simon of Glaisdale, Lord Edmund-Davies, Lord Scarman and Lord Bridge of Harwich
Legal AidCostsSuccessful unassisted partyInterlocutory appeal determined against assisted plaintiffCourt of Appeal ordering defendants' costs to be paid out of legal aid fundWhether appeal to Court of Appeal “separate proceedings”Whether “proceedings … finally decided”District registrar's order striking out defence and entering judgment for plaintiffsAssisted defendant's appeal to judge in chambers dismissedJudge ordering plaintiffs' costs to be paid out of legal aid fundWhether judge in chambers “appellate court”Whether district registrar “court of first instance” Legal Aid Act 1974 (c. 4), ss. 13 (1) (3), 14 (1) (a) (5) [1] Legal Aid (Costs of Successful Unassisted Parties) Regulations 1964 (S.I. 1964 No. 1276), reg. 2 [2] Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1971 (S.I. 1971) No. 62 (L. 1)), reg. 6 (1) (b) [3]

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies