[COURT OF APPEAL]
HORTON v. HORTON (No. 2).
[Plaint No. 004271.]
1960 Oct. 31;
Nov. 1.
Ormerod, Willmer and Upjohn L.JJ.
Husband and WifeMaintenanceAgreementAlterationConsiderationSeparation deedCovenant by husband to pay wife monthly sumSupplemental agreement not under seal obliging husband to pay sum tax freeSupplemental agreement declared to express parties' original intentionWhether supplemental agreement unenforceable for want of considerationWhether wife's refraining from suit for rectification sufficient consideration.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies