[HOUSE OF LORDS]
BIRMINGHAM CORPORATION APPELLANTS AND WEST MIDLAND BAPTIST (TRUST) ASSOCIATION (INC.) RESPONDENTS
[ON APPEAL PROM WEST MIDLAND BAPTIST (TRUST) ASSOCIATION (INC.) v. BIRMINGHAM CORPORATION.]
1969 May 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21;
July 16
Lord Reid, Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest, Lord Upjohn, Lord Donovan and Lord Wilberforce
Compulsory PurchaseCompensationEquivalent reinstatement Relevant date for assessment of cost of reinstatementBaptist chapelNotice to treat in 1947Site not allocated for new chapel until 1958Commencement of work of reinstatement not possible until 1961Cost of reinstatement in 1961 far greater than cost in 1947Whether date of notice to treat or date of commencement of work relevant date“Basis of the reasonable cost of equivalent reinstatement” Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act, 1919 (9 & 10 Geo. 5, c. 57), s. 2, r. 5 Land Compensation Act, 1961 (9 do 10 Eliz. 2, c. 33), s. 5, r. 5.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies