[PRIVY COUNCIL.]
THE QUEEN APPELLANT; AND MURUGAN RAMASAMY RESPONDENT.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, CEYLON
1964 July 21.
LORD DILHORNE L.C., VISCOUNT RADCLIFFE, LORD MORRIS OF BORTH-Y-GEST, LORD HODSON and LORD PEARCE.
CeylonCriminal lawEvidenceStatements made in course of police investigationInadmissibility applicable to evidence of both oral and written statements and to both accused and witnessesStatutory provision admitting evidence of fact discovered as result of statement when in police custodyStatutory provision that statements to police inadmissibleReconciliationGeneralia specialibus non derogant Evidence Ordinance (Legislative Enactments of Ceylon, 1938 Rev., c. 11), s. 27 (1) Code of Criminal Procedure (Legislative Enactments of Ceylon, 1938 Rev., c. 16), s. 122 (3).
CrimeEvidenceConfessionStatement leading to discovery of relevant factFinding of gunPrinciple of admissibility.
StatuteConstructionGeneralia specialibus non derogantProvision that statements to police inadmissible in evidenceProvision that statement leading to discovery of fact admissible.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies