[BRISTOL ASSIZES.]
REGINA v. MCDONNELL.
1965 May 20.
Nield J.
CrimeConspiracyCompany, with“One man” companyDefendant sole person responsible for acts of companyWhether a conspiracy between defendant and company.
CrimeConspiracyIndictment“Rolled-up charge”Undesirability.
CrimeIndictmentCount, framing ofCommittal for trial on charges of conspiracy with company “and with others unknown”“And with others unknown” omitted from counts in indictmentWhether a substantial departure from chargesWhether ground for quashing indictmentWhether sufficient evidence disclosed on deposition to support charge“The offence” Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1933 (23 & 24 Geo. 5, c. 36), s. 2 (2).
CompanyPsycheConspiracy to defraudDirector sole person responsible for acts of companyWhether director can conspire with company.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies