[HOUSE OF LORDS.]
RUBBER IMPROVEMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER APPELLANTS; AND DAILY TELEGRAPH LTD. RESPONDENTS.
SAME APPELLANTS; AND ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS LTD. RESPONDENTS.
[ON APPEAL FROM LEWIS v. DAILY TELEGRAPH LTD.]
1962 Dec. 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19.
1963 Mar. 26.
LORD REID, LORD JENKINS, LORD MORRIS OF BORTH-Y-GEST, LORD HODSON and LORD DEVLIN.
Libel and SlanderJustificationSuspicion of crimeStatement that Fraud Squad inquiring into affairs of limited companyOrdinary meaning of words admitted to be defamatory, but justifiedProof of police inquiry in progress at date of reportWhether justificationWhether words reasonably capable of meaning plaintiffs guilty of fraud.
Libel and SlanderPleadingsInnuendoNot supported by extrinsic factsDuty to withdraw unproved innuendo from juryNot applicable if innuendo relying only on words usedWhether implied meaning should be pleaded R.S.C., Ord. 19, r. 6 (2).
Libel and SlanderDamages for libelAssessment by juryLibel of limited company and chairmanNo plea of special damageNo proof of general loss of businessHigh award of damagesConsiderations justifying interference with award by appellate courtTax position relevant to question of excessive or inadequate award of damagesSimilar libels in two newspapers Defamation Act, 1952 (15 & 16 Geo. 6 & 1 Eliz. 2, c. 66), s. 12.
DamagesTax elementLibelApplication of Gourley's case.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies