[QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION AND COURT OF APPEAL]
ANGLO-SAXON PETROLEUM CO. LTD. v. ADAMASTOS SHIPPING CO. LTD.
1957 Jan. 16, 17, 18;
Feb. 1.
Apr. 8, 9, 10, 11, 16.
Devlin J. Denning, Parker and Sellers L.JJ.
ShippingCharterpartyClause paramount“This bill of lading” subject to ActWhether clause meaninglessHague Rules“Loss or damage arising … from unseaworthiness”Meaning of “loss or damage”Whether applicable to non-cargo-carrying voyagesWhether applicable only to physical loss or damage Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of United States, 1936, ss. 2, 3 (1), 4 (1) (2), 5 and 13 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1924 (14 & 15 Geo. 5, c. 22), Schedule, Arts. II, III, rr. 1, 8; IV, rr. 1, 2; V.
ContractConstructionRepugnancy.
ShippingCharterpartyConsecutive voyage charterExtent and nature of owners' obligations to provide and maintain seaworthy vessel during “the voyage”Continuing warranty of seaworthiness, perils of sea excepted“Proceed with all convenient despatch”Vessel rendered unseaworthy by incompetence at staffOwners vicariously liable for negligence of servants despite owners' exercise of due diligence in selection and appointment of staffDelaysWhether claim for loss of services of vessel sustainableBasis for assessment of damages.
ArbitrationCase statedFormUndesirability of construing with too rigid an eye.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies