[CHANCERY DIVISION]
In re HASTINGS (No. 3).
1959 March 5, 6.
Vaisey and Harman JJ.
Habeas CorpusCriminal cause or matterSuccessive applicationsRefusal of applications by Queen's Bench Divisional CourtApplication renewed to Chancery Divisional CourtBased on same evidence and same groundsWhether court entitled to entertain applicationApplications to different judges of same Division Habeas Corpus Act, 1679 (31 Car. 2, c. 2), s. 2 Habeas Corpus Act, 1816 (56 Geo. 3, c. 100), ss. 3, 6 Supreme Court of Judicature Act, 1873 (36 & 37 Vict. c. 66), ss. 3, 46 Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925 (15 & 16 Geo. 5, c. 49), ss. 1, 63.
High CourtJurisdictionDivisional CourtJurisdiction of judge to reserve point for its consideration Supreme Court of Judicature Act, 1873, s. 46.
High CourtDivisionJudge of High CourtAssignment to particular DivisionDivisions not separate courts.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies