[CHANCERY DIVISION]
BATH v. BATH.
[1860 B. 98.]
1901 Jan. 16, 17.
KEKEWICH J.
PracticeFund in CourtPayment out to Person not entitledNon-disclosure of facts by Applicant and his SolicitorAbsence of Stop OrderCommissioners of TreasuryLiability to replace FundDefault of Paymaster Court of Chancery (Funds) Act, 1872 (35 & 36 Vict. c. 44), s. 5.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies