[PRIVY COUNCIL.]
ARISTIDE OUELLETTE APPELLANT; AND CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RESPONDENTS.
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
1925 March 30.
VISCOUNT HALDANE, LORD DUNEDIN, LORD SHAW, LORD PHILLIMORE, and LORD DARLING.
CanadaRailwayTrain crossing HighwayStatutory Requirements“Train”Interpretation of StatuteReferences to previous Legislation Railway Act, 1919 (9 & 10 Geo. 5, c. 68, Dom.), s. 2, sub-s. 34; s. 310, sub-s. 1.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies