Results: 104

  • In re Speight

    20 Jan 1883 22 Ch D 727; [1875-1890] 22 Ch 727, CA (BACON, V.C. JESSEL, M.R., LINDLEY and BOWEN, L.JJ.)

    26 Nov 1883 9 App Cas 1, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 19.
    TRUSTEETrustee and cestui que trustLiability of Trustee for Trust Moneys lost through Broker.
    TRUSTEE AND CESTUI QUE TRUSTLoss of Trust FundEmployment of Broker
  • Wilson v De Coulon

    20 Feb 1883 22 ChD 841 {0} {1}, Ch D (Fry J)

    PRACTICECommission to take Evidence abroadSingle Commissioner
  • Biggs v Peacock

    04 Apr 1882 20 ChD 200, Ch D

    21 Nov 1882 22 ChD 284, CA

    PARTITIONTrust for SalePartition Act, 1868, s. 4 [Revised Ed. Statutes, vol. xv. p. 696].
    PARTITIONPartition suitPartition Act, 1868 (31 & 32 Vict.c. 40), s. 4 [Revised Ed. Statutes, vol. xv. p. 696]
  • Eaton v Storer

    15 Nov 1882 22 ChD 91 {0} {1}, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 2.
    PRACTICEPleadingsLeave to deliver Reply after Time
  • Mchenry v Lewis

    13 May 1882 21 ChD 202, Ch D (Chitty J)

    09 Dec 1882 22 ChD 397, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICEStay of proceedingsTwo Actions in this Country
  • Ex parte Bath; In re Phillips

    23 Nov 1882 22 ChD 450 {0} {1}, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKRUPTCYProof in bankruptcyInterest
  • In re Pumfrey, dec'd; The Worcester City and County Banking Company v Blick

    17 Nov 1882 22 ChD 255, Ch D (Kay J)

    Subsequent considerations : 2 neutral; most recently considered: 2022. Subsequent citations: 1.
    TRUSTEESettlementPower to purchase Land
  • In re J B Palmer’s Application; In re Trade-Marks Registration Act, 1875

    10 Nov 1882 22 ChD 88, CA

    PRACTICEStaying ProceedingsStaying Trial of Issue pending Appeal on Question of Law
  • Croggan v Allen

    12 May 1882 22 ChD 101, Ch D (Fry J)

    COSTSAdministration
    FRY, J.:— In this action the only question remaining for decision is the question of costs. Another question was raised, which was this, whether the Defendants who had paid into the account of the Plaintiff the income from about a year after the death of her husband were bound to obtain from her a copy of her account and to verify that for her information. That question is I believe the only other question which has arisen in the action. That came before the Chief Clerk, and he determined that such an account must be obtained by the Defendants from
  • Ex parte Jacobson; In re Pincoffs

    30 Nov 1882 22 ChD 312, CA

    DEBTDebtor's summonsSecurity

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies