Results: 21

  • Citizens’ Bank Of Louisiana v First National Bank Of New Orleans

    19 Jun 1873 LR 6 HL 352, HL

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKINGBankBills
  • James v Eve

    13 Jun 1873 LR 6 HL 335, HL

    COMPANYCompaniesIllegal Appointment of Directors
  • Weguelin v Cellier

    27 May 1873 LR 6 HL 286, HL

    SHIPPINGConsigneesFreight on Shipowner's own Goods
  • Peek v Gurney

    31 Jul 1873 LR 6 HL 377, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 12.
    COMPANYProspectusAllottee
  • Attorney-General at the Relation of Frederick Bailey v Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses Of Cambridge

    10 Jun 1873 LR 6 HL 303, HL

    MARKET“Enlarge.”
    LORD CHELMSFORD:— My Lords, the short question upon this appeal is, whether under the powers conferred by the Cambridge Corporation Act, 1850, for enlarging and improving the market of the borough, the Respondents are empowered to build a new corn exchange on a site which they have already purchased, and to exercise their borrowing powers for that purpose, charging the loan upon the borough fund. My Lords, from the evidence it appears that the principal market within the borough to which the Act refers is a market which was held on Saturdays, extending over Market Hill, Peas Hill, and Butchers'
  • Taff Vale Railway Co v J M Macnabb

    09 May 1873 LR 6 HL 169, HL

    COVENANTCovenants in a leaseRailway and Docks
  • Hill v Crook

    27 May 1873 LR 6 HL 265, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral.
    WILLIllegitimate Children.
    LORD CHELMSFORD:— My Lords, the question in this case is not, as the Solicitor-General stated upon the opening of the appeal, what amount of intention must be expressed in order to allow illegitimate children to take under a will, but whether there is a sufficient indication in the will in question of an intention that the children of Mary Crook, the daughter of the testator (who by law were illegitimate), should take under the description of “all and every the children or child of my daughter Mary Crook.” To lay down such an abstract rule as suggested would be impossible,
  • Lamare v Dixon

    31 Jul 1873 LR 6 HL 414, HL

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    CONTRACTAgreementSpecific Performance
  • Allen v Bishop Of Gloucester

    16 Jun 1873 LR 6 HL 219, HL

    ECCLESIASTICAL LAWChurch building actSubscribers
  • Attorney-General v Great Eastern Railway Co

    14 Jul 1873 LR 6 HL 367, HL

    RAILWAYPower to stop up a StreetDeposited Plans.
    LORD CHELMSFORD:— My Lords, the short point in this appeal depends upon the construction of two clauses in the special Act for the formation of the Respondents' railway and in the Railways Clauses Consolidation Act, which is incorporated in it. The preamble of the special Act, which was passed in 1864, recites that “It is expedient that the company should be authorized to purchase all the lands and buildings in the city of London comprised within an area bounded on the northern side by the properties numbered respectively 315, 316, 531, and 545, in the parish of St. Botolph, Bishopsgate,

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies