Results: 43

  • The Mali Ivo

    27 Apr 1869 LR 2 AE 356, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COLLISIONCollision in foreign watersLis alibi pendens
  • The Lizzie (No 1)

    21 Apr 1868 LR 2 AE 254, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    ADMIRALTYBottomryDuty of Master to communicate with Owner of Cargo before hypothecating.
    SIR ROBERT PHILLIMORE. The Lizzie, a brig belonging to the port of Cardiff, sailed under a charterparty, dated Liverpool, the 15th of July, 1865, by which it was agreed between the owner, George Noel, and Daniel Price, of Minatitlan, merchant, that the vessel should, after discharge of outward cargo, proceed to Minatitlan, in the river Goatzocoalcos, where she was to receive a cargo of mahogany and (or) cedar, and proceed with it to Queenstown or Falmouth, for orders to discharge in a safe port in the United Kingdom, and deliver the same to the charterers, on payment of freight. The
  • The Freedom (No 1)

    27 Jan 1869 LR 2 AE 346, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    SHIPPINGDamage to CargoPleading
  • The Feronia

    04 Feb 1868 LR 2 AE 65, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    SHIPPINGRight of master also part owner to payment of wages and disbursements out of freightMortgagees in Possession
  • The Bishop Of Norwich v Pearse

    04 Jun 1868 LR 2 AE 281, Arches Ct (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    CRIMECriminal suitEvidence of Defendant
  • The Royal Charter

    16 Feb 1869 LR 2 AE 362, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    COSTSPracticeDamage caused by Pilot employed compulsorily
  • The Leader

    27 Jun 1868 LR 2 AE 314, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    PRACTICEGarnishee OrderAttorney's Lien for Costs
  • The Excelsior

    27 May 1868 LR 2 AE 268, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    SHIPPINGDamage done by a ship to a breakwaterRespective Duties of Master and Dockmaster.
    May 27. SIR R. PHILLIMORE. The questions for the Court to decide are, whether the damage (which is clearly proved) was caused by the negligence or default of the master or his servants, or by the misconduct of the dockmaster in causing the vessel to be improperly moored; or whether the damage was caused partly by the misconduct of the master of the vessel, and partly by that of the dockmaster. [After stating the facts as above]:— These are the principal facts of the case. The law applicable to them must be determined by a consideration of the respective duties
  • Sheppard v Bennett

    30 Apr 1869 LR 2 AE 335, Arches Ct (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    ECCLESIASTICAL LAWChurch Discipline Act (3 & 4 Vict. c. 86)Letters of Request
  • The Thetis

    01 Jul 1869 LR 2 AE 365, Admiralty (Sir Robert Phillimore)

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral; 1 negative; most recently considered: 1971. Subsequent citations: 1.
    SHIPPINGMaster's authoritySalvage Services.
    July 1. SIR R. PHILLIMORE, It has been contended that I ought not to condemn the owners of the Thetis, or render them liable for the damages of this collision, because the master of the Thetis was not acting within the scope of his authority as their agent or in the course of his employment as their servant in attempting to assist the Sardis, which attempt led to the collision in question. In support of this contention a number of cases were cited to the Court from reports of the decisions at common law. The last case upon this subject

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies