Assethold Ltd v Leaseholders of Corben Mews

Subject Matter

LANDLORD AND TENANT — Service Charge — Whether reasonable — Costs of a waking watch

[2022] UKUT 282 (LC), UT (LC)

Cases Cited

Cases cited in: Assethold Ltd v Leaseholders of Corben Mews [2022] UKUT 282 (LC), UT (LC)

Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd (The British Unity) [2015] UKSC 17; [2015] 1 WLR 1661; [2015] ICR 449; [2015] 4 All ER 639; [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep 240; [2015] IRLR 487; [2015] WLR (D) 158; The Times, 6 April 2015; [2015] Pens LR 431; Case details, SC(E)

Cos Services Limited v Nicholson [2017] UKUT 382 (LC)

Forcelux Ltd v Sweetman [2001] 2 EGLR 173, LT

Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17; [2013] 1 WLR 935; [2013] 2 All ER 405; [2013] 2 Cr App R 115; [2013] WLR (D) 110; Case details, SC(E)

R (Prudential plc) v Special Comr of Income Tax [2013] UKSC 1; [2013] 2 AC 185; [2013] 2 WLR 325; [2013] 2 All ER 247; [2013] STC 376; [2013] 1 FCR 545; [2013] 2 Costs LR 275; [2013] WLR (D) 20; (2013) 163 NLJ 109; The Times, 5 February 2013; Case details, SC(E)

Socimer International Bank Ltd v Standard Bank London Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 116; [2008] Bus LR 1304; [2008] 1 Lloyd's Rep 558, CA

Waaler v Hounslow London Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 45; [2017] 1 WLR 2817; [2017] WLR (D) 72, CA

Commentary

Nearly Legal
Waking watch costs and flawed reports Case comment

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies