In re NY (A Child)

Subject Matter

CHILDREN — Inherent jurisdiction — Summary return order — Father’s application for summary return of child to Israel — Child habitually resident in Israel at time of alleged wrongful retention by mother but present in England and Wales at time of father’s application — Court finding Hague Convention not applying — Whether permissible for court to make summary return order under inherent jurisdiction — Whether court restricted to making order as specific issue order — Whether exercise of inherent jurisdiction flawed — Children Act 1989 (c 41), ss 1(3), 8(1), 10 — FPR Practice Direction 12D, para 1, Practice Direction 12J

[2019] UKSC 49; [2020] AC 665; [2019] 3 WLR 962; [2020] 1 All ER 923; [2019] 2 FLR 1247; [2019] WLR (D) 601, SC(E)

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies